Defying Death in Utah Arches: A Thrill Too Far?
Corona Arch - photo by Dave Webb |
We reported on the Corona Arch swing a
few weeks ago, mentioning that BLM is considering placing new
restrictions on recreation in the area. BLM will hold public hearing
before deciding on management and we encourage you to submit your
opinion.
The Times article is noteworthy because
it shines a strong national spotlight on the controversy. But there
is even debate on whether national exposure is good or bad. Some Utah
residents say, in effect, this is our state, our issue, we alone
should make these decisions. We don't need New York people weighing
in on Utah land management.
I disagree. Southern Utah is my
backyard, but it is a national treasure and important playground for
people from all over the world. It is a bigger issue than where Utah
sheep should be allowed to graze or where we should dig new mines.
Today KSL.com has this new report on a
related issue:
“Fourteen
senators... sent a letter to the president saying Utah should have a
Greater Canyonlands National Monument.
“They say the
1.8 million acres around Canyonlands National Park are some of the
nation’s most stunning, wild and unique landscapes and should 'be
permanently protected.'”
Some Utahns are noting that most of the
14 Senators have never set foot in the area, yet they are pushing for
federal control of the land.
Utah Representative Jim Matheson, a
Democrat, made this interesting assessment of the proposal:
"I'm never
big on national monuments being created by a president," said
Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah. "I think it ought to go through the
legislative process where we can have witnesses and input from all
the stakeholders. That's the way you make public lands decisions."
Public input is important, from Utahns,
from interested people in New York, and from others around the
national. Here's hoping you will pay attention and make your voice
heard.
– Dave Webb
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home